Give Matt A Tip !
Watching the Hunt for Red October the other night, I found another one. However, the old notion of “predictive programming” is “first grade truth.”
Give Matt A Tip !
Watching the Hunt for Red October the other night, I found another one. However, the old notion of “predictive programming” is “first grade truth.”
The entire reality is a scripture… the word became flesh… 9/11 touching of the monolith, the Lions Gate 88 finis temporis, learn your lessons, drop the baggage …… the reality is the classroom, a fake reality, bounded by the devils tricks, its rules, …. When your ready to walk out You will… Vanilla sky guy screaming for “Support !!!!”” Hahaha.
Wow I thought I was reading my own messages. I guess we think alike. Awesome 🥰
Thy blood shall be thicker then water, and may thou waters, be purified by the salts of salvation, for the tree of life and all it’s branches bearing from the olives to figs.
We live in a simulation so yes everything is known beforehand and displayed in ways maybe for hindsight atp. This is the copy reality that so that we get all the shit out of the way. If you need to lie cheat or steal you’ll do it here so you don’t corrupt the original. If you need to blode things up then it will happen here since we don’t have that in heaven. Cheers to getting rid of our defected characteristics and cheers to Matt who has been graciously serving our main character players for years. With a smile and sometimes a stoivtastant
Just for fun: In the shot from Back to the Future with the flaming tire tracks and electric line, the flames on the electric line look like Arabic writing.
Good catch – it’s what it looks like. That film is riddled.
Which of these two explanations for reality indicate the most importance of a being (you and me)? 1) Something out there does it all for me? or 2) I am somehow making it all happen myself?
Things can change due to retrocausality, but groups of people conspiring to maintain their class interests is a leap too far. Ok, Matt. But you’re the leader of this cult, so I’ll defer.
A dream has no excitement. No adrenaline, no edge of your seat stuff. Its boring.
“Reality” could be described as a dream -“all for me” – all from me. It’s The Trick.
But
Look at it from the Other End :-
It’s going to have to be very clever to pull this Illusion off.
The Matrix (!) will have to be believable.
Complex.
Deep.
Engaging.
Baffling.
and most of all look like it’s – “Not us”, “not from me”. Not my dream.
Most people think Reality is real. It’s working – The Game Board is established for most.
Paraphrasing and adapting Alan Watts:-
If you could dream any dream. Have any kind of pleasure. After many many goes at it , many lifetimes of 75 years or so, and every kind of pleasure and thrill. Seeking greater and greater immersion and surprises.
Where would you be? You’d be right here, sitting here, reading this.
Every war was a scam and every war memorial is a creepy scoreboard of dead boys names. Sacrifice ritual.
Perhaps there is a certain level of paying homage to those that were sacrificed for the ‘greater good’ (of the notnilc) I get that sense whenever a king or president lays a ‘wreath’ For sure some sort of creepy back story to those as they are used for death and christmas. Those military grave sites with all the anonymous endless white crosses mean more than they look like on the surface. The poppy worn by all notnilc minions to ‘commemorate WW1’ are said to be a nod to the poppy fields of those wretched battle grounds. And we know how important poppy fields are to the notnilc.
Psychological Conditioning
Science: Do photons really exist?By John Gribbin
20 August 1994
Photons do not exist, according to Geoff Jones of the University of
Sussex. Jones believes that it is ‘wrong, and unnecessary’ to describe light
in terms of small, localised particles. If he is right, the quantum world
is less mysterious than physicists would have us believe.
Jones has used his controversial idea to eliminate some of the confusion
surrounding quantum descriptions of the famous double-slit experiment, which
demonstrates that light can behave both as a wave and a particle (European
Journal of Physics, vol 15, p 170).
In the double-slit experiment, a beam of light passes through the two
slits and produces an interference pattern on a detector screen – a pattern
of light and dark bands. A similar kind of pattern is produced when water
waves pass through slits. The puzzle of quantum physics is that even when
the beam of light is so weak that it can be considered to be made of ‘particles
of light’ or photons, the spots of light made by individual photons arriving
at the screen eventually build up an interference pattern. How does each
photon (which common sense says can only go through one slit or the other)
‘know’ about the slit it does not go through, and direct itself to the appropriate
place on the detector screen?
Jones quotes many standard texts which highlight this phenomenon, described
by Richard Feynman as the ‘central mystery’ of the quantum world. He then
explains that they are all wrong. In his picture, an electromagnetic field…
fills the entire experiment (in principle, the entire Universe), and ‘knows’
that there are two slits there. What actually travels through the experiment
is not a little particle, but a disturbance in the electromagnetic field.
What is ‘detected’ as a photon is the removal of one quantum or packet of
energy from the field. ‘The idea of a single ‘photon’ propagating is meaningless,’
says Jones.
The Rap clip looks like it is set in a funeral parlor.
It’s inevitable to notice patterns. Everything we (as westerners) experience is supposed to be describable using 26 characters (plus 10 if you count numbers) These characters only limit the discussion of existence , description of existence, actual existence is not constrained by language.
It’s a vestigial, primitive belief similar to the ancient elemental table (Earth, wind, fire, and water) the table has since expanded slightly (94-118 types of stuff) it’s still ridiculous to assume that everything is composed of these pieces.
All food (according to the control system) supposedly falls into three groups: carbs, fat, protein. Imagine trying to describe a royal banquet using just those three categories.